Women's Health, Your Way

Ask & Search With Clara

Welcome to a new standard for women's health answers.

GIRLHOOD / What Else Are Our Mammograms Trying to Tell Us?

What Else Are Our Mammograms Trying to Tell Us?

What Else Are Our Mammograms Trying to Tell Us?

I’ve spent more time than I care to admit staring at patient portals, waiting for test results to populate. Fertility labs. Hormone panels. Bloodwork that’s supposed to explain why something feels off, or confirm what you already suspect. It's that specific kind of waiting where you’re still functioning, parenting, answering emails, but also mentally preparing for every possible outcome, all at once. When the word normal finally appears, there’s relief, sure, followed quickly by exhaustion — because if everything’s normal, then why does it feel like it took this much effort to get there?

Being proactive about your health, especially as a woman, is rarely just one test. It’s usually a series of them, spaced out over time, and they rarely tell the full story on their own.

Which is why a recent study stopped me in my tracks. Researchers found that routine mammograms may also reveal early signs of cardiovascular disease — specifically, calcium buildup in the arteries of the breast, something radiologists can see but don’t typically report because it isn’t linked to breast cancer. (Of course. Because women’s bodies are nothing if not efficient multitaskers.)

Here’s the part that feels both fascinating and infuriating: heart disease is still the number one killer of women, yet women are more likely to be diagnosed later and have worse outcomes. Not because we don’t show up for care (we do), but because the tools used to assess risk often underestimate us. Our symptoms are messier, our timelines don’t match the studies, and our bodies don’t follow the script.

But this new research suggests that information we’re already generating — from mammograms we’re already getting! — could help flag risk earlier, without another appointment or another scan, just a fuller picture using data that already exists. Which makes the real question less about what women should be doing, and more about whether the system is ready to connect the dots it already has… and maybe, finally, pay attention.

More from GIRLHOOD

This week, the New York Times ran a piece that could genuinely lower women's odds of getting ovarian cancer, then put it behind a paywall. I clicked, hit the wall,... Read more
I spent part of this week at a fertility conference, sitting in a talk on "restorative reproductive medicine," a term I'd seen floating around fertility TikTok but never actually had... Read more
I don't think I'm alone in not being able to look away from the Lindsay Clancy case — the Duxbury, Massachusetts mom currently on trial for killing her three children.... Read more
I had a 15-hour travel day on Monday, so naturally, I binge-watched the last few episodes of the most recent season of The Ultimatum, and DAMN.For anyone who hasn't fallen... Read more
I used to love summer. Warm sunshine on my face, a good book in my hand, the salt air wind in my face.Then I had kids.I should start by saying... Read more
One of my brother's best friends was just diagnosed with breast cancer at age 33. When he told me, I was taken right back to when my friend Lisa called... Read more
For most of my twenties, I exercised to be smaller. Not stronger, not healthier, smaller. The metric was always the same: take up less space, burn more than you consumed,... Read more
There's a trend going around on social media called "things that are worth the money," and forty-five minutes into it, I'd added a Hatch alarm clock and the softest modal... Read more
Apparently up to 80% of women will develop a fibroid by the time they turn 50. I only found this out a few weeks ago, at age 37, which feels... Read more
I'm not ashamed to admit it: Pride and Prejudice is my entire personality right now.What I am a little ashamed to admit is that I hadn't read it until now,... Read more